Who Killed the Constitution?
By Thomas E. Woods, Jr. and Kevin R. C. Gutzman
By Thomas E. Woods, Jr. and Kevin R. C. Gutzman
By Thomas E. Woods, Jr. and Kevin R. C. Gutzman
By Thomas E. Woods, Jr. and Kevin R. C. Gutzman
Category: Domestic Politics
Category: Domestic Politics
-
$18.00
Jul 07, 2009 | ISBN 9780307405760
-
Jul 08, 2008 | ISBN 9780307449382
YOU MAY ALSO LIKE
The Republican War Against Women
U.S. vs. Them
America Back on Track
Let’s Stop Beating Around the Bush
It’s My Party Too
Court of Appeal
How Barack Obama Won
Beyond the Burning Cross
Gag Rule
Praise
“If you want to know why the federal government regulates the air you breathe, the water you drink, and the words you speak, read Who Killed the Constitution? . . . When the history of these unfree times is written, Tom Woods’s and Kevin Gutzman’s fearless work will be recognized as the standard against which all others are measured.”
–Judge Andrew Napolitano, Fox News senior judicial analyst and bestselling author of The Constitution in Exile
“It’s about time someone shouted out that the emperor has no clothes.”
–Kirkpatrick Sale, director of the Middlebury Institute and author of Human Scale
"Woods and Gutzman (two bestselling authors in thePolitically Incorrect Guide series) appeal to both left and right in this constitutionalist jeremiad. Liberals will agree about the unconstitutionality of the draft, warrantless wiretapping and presidential signing statements. Conservatives will agree about the unconstitutionality of school busing, bans on school prayer and Roosevelt’s suspension of the gold standard. The common thread is the authors’ brief for a federal government strictly limited to the powers explicitly granted by the Constitution. The authors’ exegeses of the Constitution and court decisions, heavy on original intent arguments, are lucid and telling, but not always consistently supportive of liberty: their reading of the First Amendment implies that state governments may restrict speech, religion and the press. Their attack on expansive federal power-even federal spending on cancer research-is perhaps too successful; it inadvertently supports scholars like Daniel Lazare who argue that the Constitution is too antiquated, constraining and hard to change to keep up with a modern consensus on civil rights and good governance."
—Publishers Weekly
21 Books You’ve Been Meaning to Read
Just for joining you’ll get personalized recommendations on your dashboard daily and features only for members.
Find Out More Join Now Sign In