1. Is Silvio a reliable narrator? Is he honest with himself? How does he change over the course of the novel?
2. Silvio writes: “I enjoy simple things, things within reach: a nice meal, some good wine, the secret, bitter pleasure of writing in this notebook; but, most especially, this divine solitude” [p. 52]. Why is writing in his notebook a “bitter pleasure”? Why does he value his solitude so highly?
3. In the same passage, Silvio says, “What else do I need? But when I was twenty, how I burned! How is this fire lit within us? It devours everything and then, in a few years, a few months, a few hours even, it burns itself out. Then you see how much damage has been done” [p. 52]. What does this “fire,” which Silvio mentions many times over the course of the novel, represent? What kinds of damage does it cause to the lives of the main characters in Fire in the Blood? How does it get “lit”?
4. Silvio refuses to help Colette tell her parents the truth about her husband’s death and tells her that, after she leaves, he’ll do what he does every night: “I’ll shut the gate. I’ll lock the doors. I’ll wind the clock. I’ll get my cards and play a few games of Solitaire. I’ll have a glass of wine. I won’t think about anything. I’ll go to bed. I won’t sleep much. Instead I’ll dream with my eyes open. I’ll see people and things from the past. As for you, well, you’ll go home, you’ll feel miserable, you’ll cry, you’ll get out Jean’s photograph and ask his forgiveness, you’ll regret the past, fear the future. I can’t say which of us will have a better night” [p. 86]. Which state of mind is, in fact, preferable? Does the novel seem to support one way of living-passionately or coldly-over the other?
5. What role does repetition play in the novel? In what ways do Brigitte and Colette both repeat the mistakes of their parents?
6. Silvio says that he’s lived long enough to know that there’s “no such thing as uncomplicated emotions” [p. 103]. Why does Silvio feel this way? What extremely complicated emotions-and complex emotional entanglements-does the novel explore?
7. Silvio tells Colette, “To you, Jean’s death is a horrific catastrophe. . . . He was a poor, jealous, clumsy lad who’s better off where he is. You blame yourself for his death? The way I see it, the only things to blame are chance or destiny” [p. 85]. Is Colette responsible for her husband’s death? What does Silvio mean by suggesting that only chance or destiny are to blame?
8. François tells Silvio: “These people are incredible. . . .They can watch a man being murdered before their very eyes and still not say a word to avoid ‘getting involved’”[p. 75]. Why do the farmers suppress what really happened in Jean’s death? What ethos governs how they view and treat their neighbors? Why are they so reluctant to get involved?
9. When a carful of Parisians stop in Moulin-Neuf to get their car repaired, Silvio remarks: “They’ll pass silent, sombre country estates and will not begin to imagine the dark, secret life within-a life they will never come to know” [p. 63]. What role do secrets play in the novel? What causes these secrets to come out?
10. Why doesn’t Silvio reveal his own past secret relationship with Hélène as he tells the story of Colette’s and Brigitte’s affairs? Why does he wait until Brigitte confronts Hélène and François?
11. Brigitte disputes François’s claim that she freely chose to marry Declos, a many forty years her senior. In what ways was hers not a free choice? What does the novel as a whole suggest about the position and relative power of women in rural French society in the years just prior to World War II?
12. The Preface to the French edition includes a journal entry in which Némirovsky outlines a novel idea: “Austerity, purity of parents who were guilty when they were young. The impossibility of understanding that ‘fire in the blood’” [p. 133]. In what ways does this brief sketch accurately describe the main themes of Fire in the Blood? Why would Némirovsky write a novel about something that is “impossible to understand”?
13. Near the end of the novel, Silvio engages in a long, slightly drunken monologue in which he finally speaks his mind about Hélène. Why doesn’t he actually say these things to her? Is he right in thinking that her happiness with François is only a pretense?
14. In many ways, Fire in the Blood describes a historical period and social milieu vastly different from contemporary America. What essential human emotions does the novel explore? In what ways does it illuminate issues that are still with us today?