Listen: Nancy Isenberg on her new book and the origins of the name “White Trash”
Nancy Isenberg, author of WHITE TRASH, chats with Amy about her in depth analysis of the history of poor whites in America.
Learn about the book here:
Not until midday did Russell finally get close enough to the fighting to hear âthe thudding noise, like taps with a gentle hand upon a muffled drumâ of artillery in action. Among congressmen and other dignitaries, many of them accompanied by their wives, he watched from atop a hill above Centreville as distant wisps of smoke marked the opposing lines. He ate a sandwich. He drank some Bordeaux heâd packed in his case. By the time he drew closer to the fighting, the Union forces were pulling back; then, suddenly, they were fleeing in a rout so complete that he could hardly believe his eyes.
Russell was on a borrowed nag threading his way toward the action when he heard loud shouts ahead of him and saw several wagons coming from the direction of the battlefield. The drivers were trying to force their way past the ammunition carts coming up the narrow road. A thick cloud of dust rose behind them. Men were running beside the carts, between them. âEvery moment the crowd increased, drivers and men cried out with the most vehement gestures, âTurn back! Turn back! We are whipped.â They seized the heads of the horses and swore at the opposing drivers.â A breathless officer with an empty scabbard dangling by his side got wedged for a second between a wagon and Russellâs horse.
âWhat is the matter, sir?â Russell asked. âWhat is all this about?
âWhy, it means we are pretty badly whipped,â said the officer, âand thatâs the truth.â Then he scrambled away.
The heat, the uproar, and the dust were âbeyond description,â Russell wrote afterward. And it all got worse when some cavalry soldiers, flourishing their sabers, tried to force their way through the mob, shouting, âMake way for the general!â
Russell had made it to a white house where two field guns were positioned, when suddenly troops came pouring out of the nearby forest. The gunners were about to blast away when an officer or a sergeant shouted, âStop! Stop! They are our own men.â In a few minutes a whole battalion had run past in utter disorder. âWe are pursued by their cavalry,â one told Russell. âThey have cut us all to pieces.â
After a while there was nothing the worldâs greatest war correÂspondent could do but fall in with the tide of men fleeing the fightÂing. In all his battles, he had never seen anything like this: âInfantry soldiers on mules and draught horses, with the harness clinging to their heels, as much frightened as their riders; Negro servants on their mastersâ chargers; ambulances crowded with unwounded soldiers; wagons swarming with men who threw out the contents in the road to make room; grinding through a shouting, screamÂing mass of men on foot, who were literally yelling with rage at every halt and shrieking out, âHere are the cavalry! Will you get on?ââ They talked âprodigious nonsense,â Russell said, âdescribing batteries tier over tier, and ambuscades, and blood running knee-deep.â As he rode through the crowd, men grabbed at Russellâs stirÂrups and saddle. He kept telling them over and over again not to be in such a hurry. âThereâs no enemy to pursue you. All the cavalry in the world could not get at you.â But, as he soon realized, he âmight as well have talked to the stones.â
It was a long way back to Washington that day. But after sevÂeral brushes with violent deserters, drunken soldiers, and more panic-stricken officers, Russell made his way in the moonlight to the Long Bridge across the Potomac and into the capital. He told anyone who asked him that the Union commander would regroup and resume the battle the next morning. But when he awoke in his boardinghouse on Pennsylvania Avenue, he found the city full of uniformed rabble. âThe great Army of the Potomac,â he wrote, âis in the streets of Washington instead of on its way to Richmond.â
The Federal capital was essentially defenseless. âThe inmates of the White House are in a state of the utmost trepidation,â Russell wrote, âand Mr. Lincoln, who sat in the telegraph operatorâs room with General Scott and Mr. Seward, listening to the dispatches as they arrived from the scene of the action, left in despair when the fatal words tripped from the needle and the defeat was already reÂvealed to him.â
For the South, âhere is a golden opportunity,â said Russell. âIf the Confederates do not grasp that which will never come again on such terms, it stamps them with mediocrity.â But the rebels stayed where they were, and the fact that they did not march on WashingÂton suggested this would be a long war.
As Russell studied the city, its politicians, and its dispositions in the aftermath of the battle, he did not agree with âmany who think the contest is now over.â He figured the Northerners had learned a lesson about âthe nature of the conflict on which they have enÂteredâ and would be roused to action. But when the Times ran RusÂsellâs article on the battle, his balanced judgment about the lessons learned got no play. The whole effect of his account of the rout was to reinforce the editorsâ image of a South that not only would fight, but that could fight better than the North and, therefore, should soon be free of it.
Read more about the American Civil War and the untold story of the Robert Bunch: an unlikely Englishman who hated the slave trade and whose actions helped determine the fate of our nation in Our Man in Charleston.
âA perfect book about an imperfect spy.” âJoan Didion
In many ways the book itself depended on Reidâs unique take on what makes a bourbon good, and how to cut through the marketing hype and tales long made up about a lone man (itâs always a man) toiling on a single still, with a single barrel, to bring you an exemplary bottle of whiskey. Every chapter we worked on became a lesson in reality versus myth. Thereâs a reason we donât know the name Lewis Rosensthiel but we know Jack Daniels, or Evan Williams. Rosenthiel is the man responsible for the legislation that cemented bourbon as an American-made whiskey. He was also Jewish, and as savvy a businessman as youâre likely to encounter in the annals of American lobbying. He had a surplus stock of whiskey to sellâa surplus that would, quite literally, evaporate into thin airâand how better to get bottles moving than to limit your competition from overseas. Only Americans could make and sell bourbon, and this definition has stuck.
Of course getting to the heart of Reidâs nuanced portrait of American boozeâa ride that includes stops at the National Museum of Health and Medicine, to peer at the whiskey-soaked bones of dead Civil War soldiers; at the Kentucky Derby, to sample the worldâs finest mint julep; and at the Jim Beam laboratory for the future bourbon flavorsârequired careful research on my part, too. By which I mean: more bourbon tasting. Memorial Day weekend, 2014, in the thick of pouring over pages of Reidâs first draft, I did my patriotic duty as Method editor and went to the liquor store. Thereâs a wonderful chapter on the creative genius behind Makerâs Markâand I sipped on Makerâs Mark. Reidâs brilliant final chapters look at the boom of craft distilleries, and I tried my first rye whiskey, from Tuthilltown Spirits, based in upstate New York.
As a reader I love the context for my drink choices. And Bourbon Empire delivers on this and so many others levels. Youâll never look at a liquor store shelfâor bar menuâthe same again.
Read more about Bourbon Empire here.
âIt’s easy to talk to a horse if you understand his language. Horses stay the same from the day they are born until the day they die. They are only changed by the way people treat them.ââ Laura Hillenbrand, Seabiscuit: An American Legend Enjoy the Derby!